Page 51 - 2011 SDCA Project
P. 51

Chapter 9:  Conclusion








                                                                                      From the Co-Chairs                                                                                                                                     9-1
                                                                                      Eight organizations that are invested in sustainable design came together to generate
                                                                                      these recommendations, to create this booklet, and to assist the City with their sustainable                                                             Conclusion
                                                                                      efforts. This group of professionals wanted to give back to Atlanta communities and to
                                                                                      the City. These organizations, members of AIA Atlanta, ASHRAE, ASLA Georgia, ASPE,
                                                                                      CSI, GSEA, IIDA Georgia, and USGBC Georgia, also wanted to make a difference.


                                                                                      Through this effort, we have come up with a comprehensive look at sustainable design
                                                                                      using the case study of Adams Park. However, the recommendations noted herein are
                                                                                      applicable to most City Recreation Centers, and to all of its parks. We hope to see a
                                                                                      notable difference in the design efforts of the City of Atlanta moving forward, and we
                                                                                      are happy to have taken part in this effort.
                                                                                      The  collaboration  of  the  Teams  on  this  project  was  seamless.  Twenty  five  or  more
                                                                                      professionals who, for the most part, did not know one another were able to generate
                                                                                      this  booklet  through  an  on  ground  Charette/Pre-Charette  process  and  online
                                                                                      communications in few week’s time, while they maintained their work hours.

                                                                                      It may not be perfect, but it is an illustration of how important giving back is today, how
                                                                                      collaboration can make a difference, and how information technology can assist us in
                                                                                      doing so. Below you will find some testimonials from the members of the teams about
                                                                                      this effort. As you can see, we got a lot out of it, we hope you will too.


                                                                                      Liset Robinson & Richard Nelson
                                                                                      Co-Chairs - 2010 RAGS Volunteer Committee





































                                                                                                                                                                                                         Adams Park Conceptual Sustainability Study
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Plans are conceptual and subject to change
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54